|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lebanon and the
Crusades
|
|
|
| |
In
the early 11th century the Fatimid caliph Hakim began to persecute
Christians, pilgrimages were cut off and he despoiled the Holy Sepulcher.
Persecution abated after his death in 1021, but relations remained
strained and became more so when Jerusalem passed in 1071 from the
comparatively tolerant Egyptians to the Seljuk Turks, who in the
same year defeated the Byzantine emperor Romanus IV at Manzikert.
The Turks at once began to persecute the Christians. Pilgrims on
their way to the Holy City were robbed and beaten. The sacred places
of the Roman Catholic Church were profaned or destroyed. When European
Christians heard of the persecution, they were outraged. Alexius
Commenus, the new emperor of Byzantium, feared that the Turks might
seize Constantinople, his capital. As the terror of the Turks spread,
Alexius Commenus sent a plea for aid to Pope Urban II at Rome late
in the 11th century. This was not the first appeal of the kind but
it may have helped to determine the time and the route of the First
Crusade, 1095-99, though its precise import is difficult to estimate.
Direct impetus was given the crusade by the great speech of Pope
Urban II at the Council of Clermont (now Clermont-Ferrand) in 1095.
Urban exhorted Christendom to go to war for the Sepulcher, promising
that the journey would count as full penance and that the homes
of the absent ones would be protected by a truce. The battle cry
of the Christians, he urged, should be 'Deus volt' [God wills it].
From the crosses that were distributed at this meeting the Crusaders
and the Crusades
took their name. Although they failed to establish a permanent presence
in the region, the Crusaders left their imprint on Lebanon. Among
the conspicuous results of the Crusades are the remains of many
towers along the coast, ruins of castles on hills and mountain slopes,
and numerous churches.
|
|
|
In August 1096 the
first real armies of knights and princes began their march. Late
in 1096, the first of the princes, Hugh of Vermandois, a brother
of Philip I of France, reached Constantinople, the emperor persuaded
him to take an oath of fealty. Godfrey of Bouillon and his brothers
Eustace and Baldwin (later Baldwin I of Jerusalem), Raymond IV of
Saint Gilles (Count of Toulouse), Bohemond I (Bohemond the Norman),
Tancred, Robert of Normandy, and Robert II of Flanders arrived early
in 1097. The armies crossed to Asia Minor, took Nicaea and defeated
the Turks at Dorylaeum (1097). 20 October 1097 saw the crusaders
reach the fortified city of Antioch, which was protected by a wall
flanked with 450 towers, stocked by the Amir Jagi-Sian with immense
quantities of provisions.
Thanks to the assistance
of carpenters and engineers who belonged to a Genoese fleet that
had arrived at the mouth of the Orontes, the crusaders were enabled
to construct battering machines and to begin the siege of the city.
Eventually Bohemond negotiated with a Turkish chief who surrendered
one of the towers, and on the night of 2 June 1098, the crusaders
took Antioch by storm. The very next day they were in turn besieged
within the city by the army of Kerbûga, Amir of Mosul. Plague
and famine cruelly decimated their ranks, and many of them, among
others Stephen of Blois, escaped under cover of night. The army
was on the verge of giving way to discouragement when its spirits
were suddenly revived by the discovery of the Holy Lance, resulting
from the dream of a Provençal priest named Pierre Barthélemy.
|
|
|
|
On 28 June, 1098,
Kerbûga's army was effectually repulsed, but, instead of marching
on Jerusalem without delay, the chiefs spent several months in a
quarrel due to the rivalry of Raymond of Saint-Gilles and Bohemond,
both of whom claimed the right to Antioch finally it was Bohemond
who remained in possession of Antioch.
It was not until April
1099, that the march towards Jerusalem was begun and not wishing
to waste more time and not realizing its strategic importance, of
the Franks marched straight through Lebanon without significant
incident. The campaign was completed in July 1099, by the taking
of Jerusalem, where the Crusaders massacred the Muslims and Jews.
The election of Godfrey of Bouillon as defender of the Holy Sepulcher
marked the beginning of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. A Latin
patriarch was elected. Godfrey was however to die in 1100 and after
his death Baldwin was crowned king of Jerusalem on 11 November 1100.
Soon the importance of Lebanon was to be realized and the country
was to see more than its fair share of war and destruction.
Over the years that
followed the birth of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem, other fiefs,
theoretically dependent on Jerusalem, were created as the crusade's
leaders moved to expand their domains. These were the county of
Edessa (Baldwin), the principality of Antioch (Bohemond), and the
county of Tripoli (Raymond). The task of maintaining the hold of
such exotic states on a relatively narrow strip of land against
a black background of Islam proved to be much more difficult than
creating them. Clearly their existence depended upon continued support
from overseas, at best a dubious procedure, and upon adequate land
and sea lines of defense. The Lebanese seaports were ringed by castles
on the landsides and provided with towers on the seaside. The towers
served as guard and observation posts. Of the nine recognizable
today that of Jbeil, southeast of the town, is the most conspicuous.
Most of the castles are likewise replacements or renovations of
older constructions from Roman, Byzantine or even Phoenician times.
The castle of Tripoli was followed by that of Tyre. Jbeil's castle,
which displays remains of Phoenician structure, came next followed
by that of Batroun. That of Sidon, Chateau de la Mer, was used by
the sainted French Crusader, Louis IX, between 1250 and 1254.
This coastal chain
of towers and forts was seconded by a higher chain on the western
spurs or slopes of Mount Lebanon intended to guard the strategic
passes leading from the Moslem interior to the Frankish seaboard.
Most conspicuous among these is Qalat al-Shaqif (Beaufort). Standing
like a sentinel on a precipitous rock above the Litani River (Leontes)
and overlooking the sea, this castle commands the Sidon-Damascus
road. Many of these towers and forts were later repaired and utilized
by the Crusaders' Moslem successors, particularly the Mamlouks.
Many of these castles in Lebanon are still standing, a physical
reminder of a forlorn and ill-advised venture.
Tripoli and Byblos
In 1102 Raymond VI
of Saint Gilles, Count of Toulouse, one of the first knights who
set out on the First Crusade in 1096, turned his attention to the
conquest of Tripoli, the most important emirate on the coast. The
Emirate of Tripoli, together with other Moslem emirates, was considered
an obstacle to the Christians since it separated the Franks (Franj)
of Antioch and Edessa from those in Jerusalem. Raymond wished to
establish a principality that would command both the coast road
and the Orontes. Despite the heavy losses he suffered in August
1101 when his entire dehydrated army of was massacred by Kilij Arslan
near the village of Merzifun, Raymond was victorious in April 1102
in a battle outside Tripoli against the Banou Ammars and the Emirs
of Homs and Damascus. Ibn al-Athir, an Arab chronicler of the time,
described the extraordinary battle:
"Saint-Gilles, may God curse his name, returned
to Syria after having been crushed by Kilij Arslan. He had only
three hundred men left. Fakhr al-Mulk, the lord of Tripoli, sent
word to King Duqaq and to the governor of Horns: 'Now is the time
to finish off Saint-Gilles forever, for he has so few troops!' Duqaq
dispatched two thousand men, and the governor of Horns came in person.
The troops of Tripoli joined them before the gates of the city,
and together they marched into battle against Saint-Gilles. The
latter threw a hundred of his soldiers against the Tripolitanians,
a hundred against the Damascenes, and fifty against the troops of
Horns; he kept fifty behind with him. At the mere sight of the enemy,
the troops of Horns fled, and the Damascenes soon followed. Only
the Tripolitanians held their ground, and when he saw this, Saint-Gilles
attacked them with his two hundred other soldiers, defeating them
and killing seven thousand of them."
His forces, however,
were too small to conquer Tripoli itself. After exacting heavy tribute
in money and horses he returned to Tortosa, his headquarters north
of Tripoli, to plan his next campaign. He learned that a Genoese
squadron of forty vessels lay at anchor at Lattakieh. He hired this
squadron for an attack on Tripoli.
The attack failed and so he moved southward and captured instead
the port of Jbeil. The Genoese were rewarded with one third of the
town.
In 1103 Saint-Gilles
who had camped on the outskirts of the city, ordered the construction
of a fortress, which to this day is still known by his name. The
well-preserved 'Qalat Saint-Gilles' is still visible in the twentieth
century, in the center of the modern city of Tripoli. At the time
of the arrival of the Franks, however, the city extended no further
than the 'Mina' quarter, the port, which lay at the end of a peninsula
access to which was controlled by this famous fortress. This fortress
was the first ever of its kind. No caravan could reach or leave
Tripoli without being intercepted by Saint-Gilles's men. The qadi
Fakhr al-Mulk wanted at all costs to destroy this citadel, which
threatened to strangle his capital. Night after night his soldiers
attempted daring raids, stabbing a guard or damaging a wall under
construction, but it was in September 1104 that the most spectacular
operation was mounted. The entire garrison of Tripoli affected a
sortie en masse, led by the qadi himself. Several Frankish warriors
were massacred and a wing of the fortress was burned. Saint-Gilles
himself was caught by surprise atop one of the flaming roofs. Suffering
from severe burns, he died five months later, in terrible agony.
On Raymond's death
in 1105 the barons of Toulouse accepted his illegitimate son, Bertrand,
as a successor. Bertrand had already governed for nearly ten years
prior to his father's death during his absence in the East. Bertrand
arranged for a Genoese squadron to accompany him when he set out
for the East in 1108 to claim his father's inheritance and to round
off his future principality by the conquest of Tripoli. Genoa had
promised to aid Bertrand take over his father's conquests. In return
they wished to receive a favored commercial position. Bertrand landed
with the Genoese squadron near Tripoli. The following is an account
of the capture of Jbeil:
|
|
| |
"The Genoese
fleet with which he had come consisted of seventy galleys, under
the command of two noble Genoese, Ansaldus and Hugh Embriacus. It
was soon apparent that they were wasting their efforts in the siege
of Tripoli at that time. It was therefore deemed advisable, in the
meantime, to attempt something worthy of remembrance. Accordingly
they begged Bertram in a friendly way to accompany them to Jbeil
by land, and they themselves directed the fleet thither. Jbeil is
a city on the coast of Phoenicia, one of the dependent cities, which
are recognized as subject to the metropolitan of Tyre, with metropolitan
right. Ezekiel the prophet mentions it, saying, "The ancients
of Gebal and the wise men thereof were in thee thy calkers."
Again, in the first book of Kings, it is written thus concerning
the same city: "So they prepared timber and stones for the
building of the house of the Lord." The ancient name of this
place was Eve, for Eveus, the sixth son of Canaan, is believed to
have been its founder. On arriving before Jbeil, the armies invested
the city both by land and by sea. The citizens were thrown into
a state of panic, for they had no confidence in the strength of
their defenses. A deputation was accordingly sent to the commanders
of the fleet, Ansaldus and Hugh Embriacus, to announce that under
certain conditions the citizens were willing to unbar the entrances
and admit them as lords. It was stipulated that those who desired
to leave be given an opportunity to do so unhindered, with their
wives and children, but that those who did not wish to abandon their
homes in the city be permitted to remain under favorable conditions.
The terms asked were granted, and they therefore surrendered the
place to the two commanders. One of these, Hugh Embriacus, received
the city for a definite time on consideration of a fixed annual
payment to the treasury of the Genoese. The same man was the grandfather
of the Hugh who rules that city today and bears the same name and
surname.
|
|
|
King Baldwin I of
Jerusalem and Bertrand became allies in the attack on Tripoli. The
city was taken on June 10, 1109 after a two thousand day siege.
The Genoese were rewarded by a quarter in Tripoli and by a castle
known as the Castle of the Constable ten miles north of Tripoli.
Bertrand was installed as the Count of Tripoli and reaffirmed his
vassalage to the Kingdom of Jerusalem. Thus did Jbeil, ancient Byblos,
come into the hands of the Genoese as a hereditary fief, controlled
by the descendants of Hugh Embriacus.
On June 29, 1170 a
terrible earthquake devastated the region. Many fortresses were
ruined including the Krak des Chevaliers and the castles of Tripoli
and Jbeil. It took many months to repair the ruined fortresses.
In the meantime the great warrior Saladin succeeded in uniting Islam
and drove the Crusaders to a narrow strip on the coast of Phoenicia.
In 1187 after Palestine surrendered he moved up the coast. Tyre
was well fortified and well garrisoned. His first attack failed
and so Saladin passed on. Sidon surrendered without a blow on July
29. Beirut capitulated on August 6 and Jbeil surrendered a few days
later on the orders of its lord, Hugh Embrtaco, whom Saladin released
on that condition. Once again the city of Jbeil came under Moslem
control. The Crusades held on to Tripoli. During the Third Crusade
early in 1197 Jbeil was recovered by the Crusaders.
On July 1, 1198 a
peace was negotiated between al-Adil, leader of the Ayoubites, and
Almaric, king of Jerusalem. It gave Jaffa to the Moslems and the
Crusaders took possession of Jbeil and Beirut. Sidon was divided
between them. The peace was to last for five years and eight months.
During the thirteenth
century Italian merchants controlled important investments in the
Near East. The three great Republics of Genoa, Venice and Pisa with
their colonies in every Levantine port dominated Mediterranean trade.
Various conflicts arose. In the conflict between the interests of
the Venetians and the Genoese in Acre the head of the Embriaco family
in Jbeil, true to his Genoese origin, defied the prohibition of
his suzerain, Bohemond VI of Antioch-Tripoli, and sent troops to
help the Genoese in Acre. This disobedience to his order and the
personal hatred of Bohemond for his vassal, Henry of Jbeil, soon
developed into war. Not only did Henry defy Bohemond's suzerainty
and maintain his independence with the help of the Genoese, but
Henry's cousin Bertrand, head of the younger branch of the
Embriaco family, attacked Bohemond in Tripoli. At the instigation
of Bohemond, Bertrand Embriaco, who owned large estates in and around
Jbeil, was beheaded by peasants while riding through one of his
villages. This resulted in a blood feud between the Houses of Antioch-Tripoli
and the Embriaco.
|
|
In 1277 Bohemond VII
of Tripoli quarreled with the most powerful of his vassals, Guy
II Embriaco of Jbeil. Guy allied himself with the Templars and Bohemond
responded by destroying the Templars' buildings at Tripoli and cutting
down a forest they owned nearby. The Master of the Temple led the
knights of the Order against Tripoli and burned the castle at Batroun.
When the Templars had moved back, Bohemond set out to attack Jbeil.
Guy, with a contingent of Templars, went to meet him. A fierce battle
took place a few miles north of Batroun resulting in the loss of
many lives on both sides. After one year's truce Guy and the Templars
attacked Bohemond again. Another truce was arranged between the
Grand Master of the Hospital and Bohemond. Guy however had ambitions
to capture Tripoli. In January 1282 with his brothers and his friends,
he smuggled himself into the Templar quarters in Tripoli. A misunderstanding
with the Templar commander started a panic and Guy and his companions
fled to a tower in the Hospital of the Templars where they were
besieged by Bohemond's troops. After a few hours they agreed, at
the request of the Hospitallers, to surrender on condition their
lives be spared. Bohemond broke his word, all of Guy's companions
were blinded. Guy himself and his brothers and cousin were taken
to Nephin and there they were buried up to their necks in a ditch
and left to starve to death. This deed shocked the vassals of Bohemond.
The allies of Guy in Tyre planned to move up from Tyre to avenge
the deaths, but Bohemond reached Jbeil before them and took over
the city temporarily.
|
|
|
|
On 27th April 1289
Tripoli fell to the Mamalik forces. Among the tens of thousands
of combatants of the Muslim army was Abul-Fida', a young emir of
sixteen. A scion of the Ayyoubid dynasty, now a vassal of the Mamlouks,
he would several years later become the ruler of the small city
of Hama, where he would devote most of his time to reading and writing.
The work of this historian, who was also a geographer and a poet,
is of interest primarily for the account it affords us of the last
years of the Frankish presence in the Middle East. Abul-Fida' was
present, sword in hand and with an attentive eye, on all the main
fields of battle, he writes:
"The city of Tripoli is surrounded by the
sea and can be attacked by land only along the eastern side, through
a narrow passage. After laying the siege, the sultan lined up a
great number of catapults of all sizes opposite the city, and imposed
a strict blockade. The Muslim troops penetrated the city by force.
The population fell back to the port. There, some of them escaped
onto ships, but the majority of the men were massacred, the women
and children captured, the Muslims amassed immense booty. A short
distance from Tripoli, in the Mediterranean Sea, there was a small
island, with a church. When the city was taken, many Franj took
refuge there with their families. But the Muslim troops took to
the sea, swam across to the island, massacred all the men who had
taken refuge there, and carried off the women and children with
the booty. I myself rode out to the island on a boat after the carnage,
but was unable to stay, so strong was the stench of the corpses."
Qalawoun, the Mamlouk
Sultan, had the city razed to the ground lest the Crusaders with
their command of the sea try to recapture it. Mamlouk troops went
on to occupy Batroun and Nephin. No attempt was made to defend these
cities. Peter Embriaco, lord of Jbeil, offered his submission to
the Sultan. He was allowed to keep his city under strict surveillance
for another decade.
Beirut
In the late autumn
of 1102 ships transporting Holy Land pilgrims home were driven ashore
by storms, some near Ascalon and some between Sidon and Tyre. The
pilgrims were either slain or taken to Egypt where they were sold
as slaves. Control of the coastal cities therefore was essential
for safe passage of pilgrims and for the landing of much needed
men and supplies from Europe. The chief objective of King Baldwin
was the capture of the coastal cities, Ascalon, Tyre, Sidon and
to the north Beirut. Both Ascalon and Tyre were strong fortresses
with a large permanent garrison so the king decided to attack Sidon
instead. A powerful squadron sailed from Egypt to protect the city
and Baldwin was obliged to raise the siege. Beirut was the next
choice and it so happened that Baldwin had a loyal ally in the area.
In 1109 he assisted Bertrand of Toulouse, one of the Crusading knights,
to capture Tripoli so in return Bertrand sent men to help Baldwin
attack Beirut. The city was taken by assault on May 13, 1110. Beirut
put up a desperate defense, according to Salih bin Yahya, and the
Crusaders inflicted great suffering upon the inhabitants. Jacques
de Vitry, a historian of the Crusades, gives this account:
"Our people lay siege to Beirut both by
sea and land, and being joined by Bertram, the noble count of Tripoli,
after a two months' siege, having brought wooden towers up to the
walls and joined them to the walls by ladders, forced their way
into the city, and slew many of the citizens, cast the rest into
chains and held them captive. Beirut is a city on the seashore between
Sidon and Biblium in the country of Phoenicia ... it is fertile
and fair, with fruit trees, woods and vineyards."
Another source for
this period is the history of William of Tyre. He tells of the siege
of Beirut and how Baldwin and Bertrand collected galleys from the
coast cities in their possession to cut off Beirut by sea. From
the pine trees in the neighborhood of the city they secured the
wood necessary to construct siege towers, ladders, bridges and catapults.
The besieged were given no rest by day or by night for two months
until they were worn out by fatigue of constantly defending the
walls. At last some soldiers leaped from one of the towers onto
the walls while the rest of the Crusaders attacked in other quarters
to keep the defenders fully occupied. Other Crusaders brought up
their ladders and scaled the walls. From the height of the walls
they leaped down and opened one of the gates, thus letting their
comrades in.
When the inhabitants
of Beirut saw the Crusaders within the gates they fled towards the
port to escape on the galleys anchored there, but the Crusaders'
fleet cut off their escape by sea. Driven back into the city they
were caught between two fires and were cut down. Few would have
escaped had not the king put an end to the slaughter. On December
4, 1110 Sidon fell to the Crusaders. They now controlled the whole
Syrian coast with the exception of the two fortress cities Tyre
and Ascalon. Tyre was taken on June 29, 1124. Jacques de Vitry writes:
"The King kept in his hand the noblest and
best part of the land/ to wit/ the cities of Jerusalem, Neapolis
(Sichem), Acre and Tyre with some other towns and villages. The
liegemen of the kingdom bound by oath to serve the King with a certain
number of knights were the Count of Tripoli, the Lord of Beirut,
the Lord of Sidon..."
The seigneury of Beirut
was assigned to the Crusader knight Foulques de Guines. In 1130
Fetullus came here and wrote that Beirut was a very wealthy city.
He was deeply impressed with a miraculous image of Christ. "Whoever
is anointed with a drop from the imaged he wrote "is restored
to health." John of Wurzburg in 1160 was struck with the wealthy
appearance of Beirut. He too was taken to see the miraculous painting
of Christ.
In 1167 Amalric I,
king of Jerusalem, gave the seigneury of Beirut to Andronic Comnenus,
a relative of his queen. In 1172 when Theodorich passed Beirut on
his way to the Holy Land he wrote: "Next to the southward on
the seashore comes Berytus, called by the modems Baruth, a rich
and strong city, large and populous."
The miraculous figure of Christ, he recorded, was preserved as a
sacred relic in the church and the limbs of cripples were anointed
with the "blood".
The harbor of Beirut
was well fortified during this period. In the year 1185 a pilgrim,
Joannes Phocas, traveled down the Lebanese coast to Beirut on his
way to Jerusalem:
"And then comes Berytus, a large and populous
city, set round about with spacious meadows, and adorned with a
fair harbor. The harbor is not a natural one, but has been wrought
by art, and is embosomed in the city in the form of a half-moon,
and at the two extremities of the half-moon are placed, as horns,
two great towers, from one of which a chain is drawn across to the
other, and shuts the ships within the harbor."
The Latin kingdom
of Jerusalem was slowly disintegrating due to personal ambition
and intrigues of members of the royal family. Sibylla, eldest daughter
of Amalric I, took as a second husband a French adventurer. Guy
de Lusignan, thus passing on to him a presumptive title to the crown.
At the death in 1186 of the young king Baldwin V, Sibylla's son
by her first marriage, in spite of the opposition of the barons
and lords of the kingdom. Guy de Lusignan acceded to the throne.
In the same year Beirut was taken over by Jocelin, count of Edessa,
a supporter of Sibylla and Guy de Lusignan.
Beirut remained in
the hands of the Crusaders until 1187. When Saladin came to the
throne of Egypt and Syria he at once began preparations to drive
the Crusaders out of the coastal cities. In 1183 he attacked Beirut.
He had secured a fleet in Egypt and assembled a large force in the
Beqaa. Sentinels were stationed on the summits of the mountains
of Lebanon to notify him as soon as the ships appeared. The Crusaders
collected ships from Acre and Tyre to ward off the attack by sea.
Saladin came over
the mountain with his army and attacked Beirut on all sides. Stones
and darts rained upon the walls with no interruption and for three
days the defenders were scarcely able to have a pause to eat. The
Crusaders fought bravely and inflicted heavy losses on Saladin's
men. An attempt was made to mine the walls but this met with no
success. When Saladin heard of the arrival of reinforcements for
the Crusaders by sea, he abandoned the siege and withdrew his army.
Saladin was biding
his time for the opportune moment to strike. It came in 1187 when
twenty thousand Crusaders marched over a sandy plain in the heat
of July to relieve the city of Tiberias. They met the forces of
Saladin at Hattin and were utterly defeated. One military success
followed the other and on October 2, 1187 Jerusalem fell to Saladin's
army.
After Saladin's great
victory at Hattin the cities of Palestine and several on the coast
were taken over by him with the exception of Tyre, which he had
attacked but failed to take. Sidon opened the gates of the city
but Beirut refused to surrender. Saladin pitched his tents on the
heights above the town. The siege lasted eight days. When the Crusaders
asked for terms to surrender, they were granted permission to take
refuge in Tyre. Before he left Beirut Saladin appointed a governor
to take charge of the city.
The loss of Jerusalem
was a great blow to the Christians of Europe. A call for a third
Crusade was made. This did not come from the papacy but from the
dominant power in Europe at the time, the three strong monarchies
of Germany, England and France. A number of converging Crusader
armies all sought to reach a common center, the coastal city of
Acre.
As Saladin went to
meet the armies of the Third Crusade, which by now were nearing
Acre, he heard of the approach of Frederick Barbarossa from the
north with an army of German Crusaders. Saladin was worried lest
the Germans take the coastal cities and establish bases there. Jacques
de Vitry describes Saladin's dilemma:
"Frederick, the Roman emperor, set out on
his journey by land with great power and a countless host of warriors.
Passing over the borders of Germany, he crossed Hungary, Macedonia
and Greece and marched through the land of the Saracens with a mighty
hand and a stretched-out arm
reached Armenia (Cecilia) where,
during great heat, he went into the river which the natives call
the Iron River, to bathe and therein for our sins was miserably
drowned. Saladin so greatly feared his approach that he ordered
the walls of Laodicia, Gibelet, Tortosa, Biblium and Beirut to be
pulled down, sparing only the fortresses, that is the citadels and
towers."
The host of Germans
faded away before it reached Acre, only a small remnant passed by
Beirut, so few that they were unable to make an attack on the city.
At the close of the
war with Richard, Saladin came to Beirut and held court here for
a few days. He received Bohemond III, prince of Antioch, with whom
he made a treaty. After the departure of the king of England Saladin
returned to Damascus where he died. Soon after dissension broke
out among his followers. The Crusaders were able to recover some
of the cities taken from them. Sidon was retaken and Crusader forces
marched up the coast towards Beirut. The governor was a certain
Tsama, who appears to have been a coward for he ran away before
the Crusaders reached Beirut. Jacques de Vitry writes:
"Likewise the city of Beirut with its citadel
was deserted by its Saracen garrison and was restored to Christendom."
Before abandoning
Beirut the Saracens tore down whatever buildings and fortifications
they could. The city was in a shambles. The seigneury of Beirut
was given to Jean of Ibelin. When called upon shortly afterwards
to defend his feudal rights to the city, the lord of Beirut replied:
"Ai recu la ville quant la crestiente l'ot
recovree, toute abatue et tele que le Temple et 1'Ospital et tous
les barons de Syrie la refuserent, et l'ay fermee et maintenue des
amones de la crestiente et de mon travail..."
The city which the
Templars, Hospitallers and the barons of Syria disdained due to
its ruined state was taken over and fortified once again by Jean
of Ibelin. The walls and towers of the castle were rebuilt and the
moat repaired. When Wilbrand of Oldenburg passed here in 1212 he
was impressed by the castle and remarked that it was strongly built.
|
|
|
Toward the end of
the Ayyoubid period, Malek al-Saleh Najm ed-Din Ayyoub succeeded
his brother and entered Cairo as sultan in 1240. He made large purchases
of Mamalik slaves for his army. The dynasties which succeeded the
Ayyoubids until the conquest of Egypt by the Ottomans have been
called Mamalik dynasties because their sultans were drawn from the
enfranchised slaves who constituted the court and were officers
in the army. In 1277 Kalaoun, a Mamlouk who had risen high in his
sovereign's service seized power. His aim was to capture the last
places that remained in the hands of the Crusaders.
In 1291 Acre revolted.
Khalil, also called Malek al-Ashraf Salah ed-Din, the son of Kalaoun,
captured and destroyed the city after a siege of forty-three days.
This was followed by the capture of Tyre, Sidon and Beirut.
With the departure
of the Crusaders the port of Beirut fell into ruin. This however
did not deter pilgrims from traveling to the Holy Land. Ludolph
von Suchem arrived in Beirut in 1350. He writes:
|
|
|
|
"The city is a common thoroughfare for pilgrims . . .
From Beirut a man can return to any country he pleases on this
side of the Mediterranean Sea, a matter which I leave to his own
choice to settle."
A church dedicated
to Saint Nicolas was held in special veneration by the Christians
and it was in Beirut it was said, that Saint George slew the dragon.
In 1365 the Crusaders
of Cyprus captured Alexandria. The sultan of Egypt ordered a large
fleet to be built at Beirut for the invasion of the island. The
project was abandoned, however, because of the superior skill
of the Crusaders at sea. In 1381 a Genoese fleet appeared off
Sidon and the city was plundered. News of the attack was reported
to Damascus and a force was dispatched to Beirut to protect the
city should an attack be made upon it too. The Genoese fleet sailed
towards Beirut to plunder but withdrew when they found the city
well garrisoned. When the troops returned to Damascus, the Genoese
came back again and made a vigorous attack on the city. There
was only a small fort to defend Beirut and the men of the garrison
holding it were plied with stones and fire darts from the ships.
They retreated behind the walls, the Crusaders landed but the
Moslems made a counterattack and forced them back to their ships.
Among the defenders of Beirut was the father of Saleh bin Yahya,
the author of the history mentioned above. News of the approach
of the Crusader fleet was "telegraphed" to Damascus
at night by bonfires and a troop of horse arrived in Beirut by
the evening of the following day, too late to take part in the
defense. It appears that a regular service of bonfires by night
and carrier pigeons by day was maintained between Damascus and
the coastal cities for use in such emergencies.
In 1404 another
Genoese fleet appeared off the coast of Beirut. The inhabitants,
unprepared to face an attack, took their belongings and fled to
the mountains. There was no one to defend Beirut. The Genoese
landed and plundered until the middle of the afternoon. Returning
to their ships unmolested, they then set sail for Sidon. This
was the last hostile act of the Genoese.
Tyre and Sidon
After the fall of
Beirut Baldwin marched on Sidon. The inhabitants of Sidon who
had fought so bravely at the beginning of the Crusades years earlier
when they organized raids against the Crusaders as they marched
south, no longer had the stomach to fight and feared a similar
fate to the inhabitants of Beirut. The people Sidon sent a delegation
of notables to plead with Baldwin for their lives, he accepted
and on December 4, 1110 Sidon surrendered to the Crusaders, there
was no massacre. The Crusaders now controlled the whole coast
with the exception of the two fortress cities Tyre and Ascalon.
In November 1111
Baldwin brought up his whole army before the walls of Tyre. He
assembled all the ships he could find and gathering all the land
forces he could, he placed his troops in a circle around the city
and besieged it. William of Tyre tells us: "Tyre lies in
the bosom of the sea like an island closed round about by waters.
It is the capital and metropolis of Phoenicia." Baldwin used
all the methods ordinarily employed in besieging a city. A series
of almost constant skirmishes and attacks exhausted the strength
of the inhabitants. The walls and towers were shattered by blows
from the siege engines. Baldwin ordered two wooden towers to be
built, far taller than the stone towers of Tyre. From the top
of these it was possible to look down into the city and mercilessly
attack all points. The Tyrians, however, showed themselves to
be shrewd and valiant. William of Tyre relates:
"They met each scheme by a similar one and strove to
repel in kind the injuries that were being inflicted upon them.
They brought together great quantities of stones and cement, mounted
two towers, which were practically opposite our machines, and
began to build them higher. Thus within a very short time these
rose far above the wooden machines opposed to them outside the
walls. From there the defenders hurled fire upon the engines below
and were prepared to bum everything, unopposed."
Baldwin had no fleet;
only twelve Byzantine vessels were at his command. The Byzantines
were not about to take hostile action against the Fatimids with
whom their relations were good unless adequate compensation was
forthcoming. They demanded that Baldwin help them recover the
cities, which they had lost to the princes of Antioch. When Baldwin
hesitated the Byzantines did not supply the Franks with provisions.
Although the Tyrians fought well they were constrained to seek
aid from Tughtigin, the Seljuk king of Damascus. Before taking
this step, however, a letter was sent to the Egyptian court to
justify this action. Tughtigin sent a carrier pigeon to establish
his first contact with Tyre, but it was intercepted by an Arab
in the Crusader's service. The message was taken to Baldwin who
sent men in disguise to meet the delegation from Damascus. These
were captured and put to death. Nonetheless Tughtigin advanced
on Tyre and besieged the Franks in their camp. Baldwin, greatly
discouraged by four wasted months before the walls of Tyre, gave
up the attempt. He was obliged to lift the siege and fight his
way back to Acre.
Baldwin now turned
his attention to affairs in northern Syria. He then went to Akaba
on the Red Sea and left a garrison there. On his return he marched
again against Tyre but contented himself with setting up a strict
blockade of the city from the land.
Baldwin occupied
himself with administration of his possessions and the building
of fortresses. He visited the Red Sea to examine the region and
was brought low with illness. Tyre was the only city on the coast
still in the possession of the enemy and the king was eager to
bring it under his power, William of Tyre tells us:
"Accordingly, this same year, after he had recovered
from his illness, he built a fortress between Acre and Tyre. This
occupied the very site where once Alexander of Macedon, in order
to take Tyre, is said to have erected a fortress and to have called
it Alexandrium from his own name. Alexandrium lies on the seashore
scarcely five miles from Tyre and is well watered by springs.
The king rebuilt it with the idea that it might be a thorn in
the side of the people of Tyre and that from it injuries might
often be inflicted upon them."
Baldwin I neglected
his final duty as king, he made no arrangement for the succession
to the throne. At his death a council of nobles decided that the
crown go to Baldwin of Le Bourg, Count of Edessa. He was a devout,
God fearing man. King Baldwin II had barely established himself
on the throne when he heard of an alliance between Egypt and Damascus.
The Fatimid vizier, Al-Afdal was anxious to avenge the incursions
of Baldwin I against Egypt, while Tughtigin of Damascus was alarmed
by the growing power of the Franks. Tughtigin laid waste to the
land of Tiberias and Baldwin retorted by marching against him
and destroying the city of Gerasa. Tughtigin had built a large
fortress there well supplied with provisions and weapons. Opinion
in the camp of Baldwin was unanimous that it should be completely
razed.
Meanwhile Balak,
a powerful Turkish prince, was making frequent incursions into
the countryside surrounding Antioch. Count Jocelyn, ruler of Edessa,
and his kinsman Galeran were captured by him and thrown into prison.
Baldwin and his army proceeded to Antioch to protect the city
and the people. Riding with some followers while inspecting the
area, Baldwin fell into the hands of Balak and was led away captive.
The captured king was bound and cast into the fortress of Quardapiert
(Kharpart) where Jocelyn and Galeran were also imprisoned. Certain
Armenians hearing the king was held in captivity devised a scheme
to rescue him and his companions. Disguised in the habits of monks,
but carrying daggers under their loose robes, they declared they
had suffered injury and desired to protest to the governor. Another
version is that they gained admittance into the fortress as merchants
selling cheap wares. By whatever means they gained an entry they
took possession of the citadel, released the king and the count
and fortified the place as best they could. Baldwin ordered Jocelyn
to depart secretly and to return with sufficient men to deliver
him. The Turks in the meantime discovered that the king and his
companions had gained control of the citadel by a clever ruse.
They seized their arms and hurried to the fortress which was built
on a hill. Balak was aware that it would be an easy task to undermine
the fortress. He therefore gave orders to dig deep tunnels into
the hill and shore them up with beams, dry boughs and other inflammable
wood. Once the workmen finished digging, fire was set to the combustible
material. When the supports burned away, the hill caved in and
a tower, which was built on it, collapsed with a crash. The Turks
swarmed in and the king surrendered to Balak without conditions.
Balak granted life to the king and Galeran, but the Armenians
were delivered over to tortures of every kind:
"Some were flayed alive, others sawn asunder; and still
others buried alive. Others Balak handed over to his men to serve
as targets in archery practice. Yet, though they suffered torture
in this world, these men had a sure hope of immortal life; though
they were tried in a few things, yet, from another point of view,
their reward was great."
The Venetians in
the meantime had enjoyed profitable commerce with the east. They
were reluctant to break these trade relationships and therefore
had not taken any great part in the Crusades up to this time.
However they saw that the Genoese and Pisans, by their connection
with the Crusader movement, were gaining many commercial advantages.
The doge of Venice, learning of the difficulties which faced the
kingdom of the East, seized this opportunity and ordered a fleet
to be made ready. With forty galleys, twenty-eight chats and four
larger ships, he set sail for Syria. The doge sighted the Egyptian
fleet near Jaffa and attacked. He won the naval battle and many
Egyptian galleys remained in the hands of the Venetians. The news
that the doge had landed in the eastern Mediterranean and had
triumphed over the Egyptians reached Jerusalem. It now remained
to come to an agreement between the doge and the barons of the
kingdom to take either Ascalon or Tyre. The representatives from
Jerusalem, Ramallah, Jaffa and Nablus wished to direct the campaign
against Ascalon, as it was nearer, and would demand less outlay
of labor and money. The people from Acre, Nazareth, Sidon, Beirut,
Tiberias, Jbeil, and other cities on the coast urged that the
expedition be led against Tyre. Their argument was that since
this was a well-fortified city, all possible efforts should be
made to take the city, otherwise the enemy by way of Tyre might
have access to Crusader territory. A compromise was reached. To
end the controversy it was decided to draw lots. William of Tyre
tells us:
"Two slips of parchment, one containing the name of Tyre,
the other that of Ascalon, were placed on the altar. Then an innocent
orphan boy was brought forward and allowed to choose between the
two, it being understood that the army should proceed without
dispute against the city named in the lot drawn. The choice fell
upon Tyre."
|
|
|
Preparations were
made for the expedition and on February 16th 1124 the Frankish army
moved up the coast and the Venetian fleet sailed parallel to it.
They laid siege to Tyre both by land and by sea. The Crusaders drew
up all their ships on dry land near the harbor. One galley alone
was kept at sea ready for any emergency which might arise. Workmen
were summoned to build siege engines of various kinds. The patriarch
of Jerusalem and the Frankish nobles assembled carpenters and builders,
provided the necessary material and directed them to build a tower
of great height. From the top of this the Crusaders could engage
in close combat with the Tyrians in the towers on the city walls.
Machines were built which could hurl huge stones to shatter the
walls. The doge and the Venetian forces built similar machines and
set them up in strategic positions. Constant attacks and skirmishes
gave the Tyrians no chance to rest. However the Tyrians were not
dismayed. They built huge machines in the city from which rocks
were hurled on the Crusader towers. According to William of Tyre:
"The fear inspired by these flying stones
enabled the foe (the Tyrians) to become masters of that particular
section, for none of the Christians dared to remain in the vicinity...
From their stations in the high towers, the enemy, armed with bows
and ballistae, poured forth showers of Javelins and arrows, and
meanwhile a never ceasing torrent of huge rocks hurled from within
the city pressed the Christians so hard that they scarcely dared
to thrust forth a hand."
|
|
|
|
The Crusaders pressed
on. From their siege towers they returned blow for blow. The Tyrians
had difficulty in repelling them. Huge stones were hurled into the
city and the towers and walls of Tyre were nearly demolished by
the force of the blows. Some missiles passed over the ramparts and
crashed with force in the city damaging buildings and injuring the
inhabitants. In the countryside cavalry and infantry forces fought
daily skirmishes with the Tyrians. Many a time the Tyrians took
the initiative to attack the Crusaders. Day by day Crusaders and
Tyrians continued their attacks, be it by machines or by fighting
around the gates. At this time, Pons, the count of Tripoli summoned
by the nobles, arrived with his forces.
His arrival strengthened
the position of the Crusaders. To the Tyrians it brought fear and
a sense of futility of resisting. Wearied by the continuous fighting
and constant skirmishes, they began to despair. Their food supply
was giving out and no one could enter or leave the city unmolested.
Scarcely any provisions now remained. They wrote to the caliph of
Egypt and the king of Damascus to inform them of their desperate
condition. Word was presently received that Tughtigin, king of Damascus,
moved by the messages had left Damascus with a large number of Turks.
He set up his camp in the vicinity of Tyre on the banks of a river
four miles from the city. It was further rumored that an Egyptian
fleet would arrive within three days with reinforcements and the
necessary food supplies. The king of Damascus was expecting more
soldiers to join him. For this reason he prudently postponed crossing
the river and attacking the Crusaders until the Egyptian fleet arrived.
He reasoned that while he was fighting the Crusaders, the naval
force might have unhindered access to the city.
The Crusaders decided
to counter all these moves. The cavalry and infantry were to march
out with the count of Tripoli and William de Bury, the king's constable,
leading them. They were to engage the forces of the king of Damascus.
The doge of Venice and his men were to set out in galleys to engage
the Egyptian fleet. The third division consisted of the people from
neighboring cities who had come to take part in the siege and a
large number of Venetians. To this contingent was given the duty
of guarding the siege engines and movable towers. They were to ensure
that the hurling machines continued to assault the city and that
the fighting before the gate was not interrupted.
The count of Tripoli,
the king's constable and their forces rode out to meet the enemy.
They advanced two miles, but the army of Tughtigin did not ride
out to meet them. It was obvious that the king of Damascus had originally
placed his camp by the river intent on crossing it. However, when
he learned of the Crusader plans, he decided it would be dangerous
to risk an encounter with them. Accordingly he ordered the trumpet
to sound the summons calling his men together and gave the command
to return home. The doge of Venice and his fleet in battle formation
sailed down to Alexandrium (known as Scandalium). Here he learned
that the king of Damascus had returned home. There was no sight
of the Egyptian fleet, so he sailed back. The siege of Tyre was
pressed forward more vigorously.
As the situation became
hopeless some young men of Tyre took a solemn oath and planned to
steal into the Crusader camp to set fire to the machines and movable
towers. They stealthily left the city and succeeded in setting fire
to an engine which was of great use to the Crusaders. The Crusaders
tried to quench the flames by pouring on quantities of water. The
fire was put out; the young Tyrians were captured and killed as
their friends looked helplessly on. The Tyrians had set up a machine
within the city which was aiming huge stones so accurately against
the Crusader's siege towers as to cause serious damage. William
of Tyre writes:
"Since there was no one in camp who possessed
the expert skill necessary for aiming and hurling the mighty missiles,
they sent to Antioch for a certain Armenian named Havedic, who was
said to be very proficient in that art. He came immediately and
displayed so much skill in directing the machines and hurling the
great stone missiles that whatever was assigned to him as a target
was at once destroyed without difficulty. As soon as he reached
the army, he was granted an honorable salary from the public treasury,
so that he might maintain himself in his customary magnificence.
He applied himself earnestly to the work for which he had been summoned
and showed so much skill that the war seemed to be carried on with
renewed strength. In fact it assumed the aspect of a new war in
the eyes of the Tyrians, whose woes were greatly increased by his
coming."
As the siege of Tyre
progressed, Balak, the Turkish prince who held Baldwin II prisoner,
was killed while besieging the city of Hierapolis. This news was
received with great joy by the armies before Tyre. The Tyrians on
the other hand were suffering desperately from hunger. They had
no hope of receiving provisions or aid. William of Tyre tells us
of a desperate act, which gained the admiration of the Crusaders.
Several young Tyrians, expert swimmers all, ventured out from the
inner harbor and succeeded in reaching the Crusader galley, which
was moored at sea. They had brought with them a rope which they
fastened to the vessel. They then cut the moorings and began to
tow the ship after them to the city. The Crusaders gave the alarm.
Men hurried to the shore but before they could decide what to do,
the youths had towed the vessel inside the city harbor. Of the five
men assigned to guard the vessel, one was killed but the other four
leaped into the sea and swam safely to shore.
The Tyrians meanwhile
were driven beyond endurance by hunger. They gathered together in
groups to discuss how to put an end to their misery. Surrender was
preferable to seeing their wives and children die from starvation.
By unanimous consent the matter was brought before the elders and
governors of the city. The entire city gathered in a public meeting
where it was decided that peace must be obtained no matter at what
risk or on what terms.
Aware of the city's
untenable situation the king of Damascus summoned his allies and
returned to his position near Tyre where he encamped by the river.
He sent envoys to the patriarch Gormond, the doge of Venice, Dominicus
Michaelis, the count of Tripoli and the other nobles on the Crusader
side. After much discussion an agreement was reached between the
two parties. The city was to be surrendered to the Crusaders on
condition that those who wished be allowed to leave freely with
their wives, children and possessions. Those who preferred to remain
at Tyre could do so and their homes and possessions would be guaranteed
from harm. The king of Jerusalem's standard was raised on the tower
over the city gate; likewise the banner of the doge of Venice was
placed on one tower; from another tower the colors of the count
of Tripoli were flown. Thus Tyre was taken on June 29, 1124, in
sixth year of the reign of Baldwin, king of Jerusalem.
The townspeople, worn
out by the long siege, came out of the city and hurried to the Crusader
camp. They were curious to examine the great siege machines and
movable towers. When the Crusader forces entered Tyre, they too,
in turn, marveled. William of Tyre writes:
"They admired the fortifications of the
city, the strength of the buildings, the massive walls and lofty
towers, the noble harbor so difficult of access. They had only praise
for the resolute perseverance of the citizens who, despite the pressure
of terrible hunger and the scarcity of supplies, had been able to
ward off surrender for so long. For when our forces took possession
of the place they found only five measures of wheat in the city."
|
|
|
In 1187 Saladin, founder
of the Ayyoubid dynasty, succeeded in uniting Islam and invaded
Syria and Palestine. Advancing along the Phoenician coast he arrived
with his army before Tyre. It was well garrisoned and the great
walls that protected it from the land were formidable. When his
first attack failed he passed on to conquer Sidon, Beirut and Jbeil.
By the end of August 1187 the cities, which remained in the hands
of the Crusaders to the south of Tripoli, were Tyre, Ascalon, Gaza,
a few isolated castles and the holy city of Jerusalem. On October
2, 1187 Saladin at the head of his armed forces entered Jerusalem.
However Saladin had
not taken Tyre, the strongest fortified city on the coast. The refugee
barons of Palestine were now crowded in the city. Joined to the
mainland by a sandy isthmus, with a great wall built across it,
Tyre appeared impregnable. Had Saladin pressed his attack on Tyre
as soon as Acre fell, this wall could not have stopped him. He delayed
too long, and the vigor of the Tyrian defense was too much for him.
He raised the siege and marched against Ascalo. When in November
1187 he again appeared before Tyre, its
|
|
|
|
fortifications had
been strengthened further. Frankish military and naval reinforcements
had arrived. At a council of war Saladin disbanded half of his army
and lifted the siege of Tyre. It was New Year's Day 1188.
At Saladin's death,
his dominions were divided between his sons, of whom Othman succeeded
as sultan of Egypt. War broke out between Saladin's sons and heirs
and the throne came to Malek al- Adil, the uncle of Othman. On July
1, 1198 a peace was negotiated between al-Adil and Almaric, king
of Jerusalem. It gave Jaffa to the Moslems; the Crusaders took possession
of Jbeil and Beirut. Sidon was divided between them. The peace was
to last for five years and eight months.
Tyre is a celebrated
city, and a frontier fortress of the Moslems. The city is surrounded
on three sides by the sea, and there is land only on the fourth
side where the roadway is defended by a fortified gate. It stands
out in the sea, as the palm of the hand does from the wrist. The
Moslems first took the city in the days of Omar, and it remained
in their hands in perfect prosperity till the year 518 (1124), when
the Franks came against the city and beleaguered and blockaded it,
till it surrendered. The ruler of Egypt had tried to raise the siege,
but the winds were contrary, and perforce he had to sail back to
Egypt. Then they capitulated, and the Moslems all left the city,
and none remained, except beggars, who could not move. The Franks
have fortified Tyre and garrisoned it and rebuilt the town, and
it remains in their hands even to the present day. Tyre is counted
as of the Jordan province.
Toward the end of
the Ayyoubid period, Malek al-Saleh Najm ed-Din Ayyoub succeeded
his brother and entered Cairo as sultan in June 1240. He made large
purchases of slaves (Mamaliks) for his army. Most of his time was
spent in campaigns in Syria. The dynasties which succeeded the Ayyoubids
until the conquest of Egypt by the Ottomans are often called Mamalik
dynasties because their sultans were drawn from the enfranchised
slaves who constituted the court and officered the army. In 1277
Kalaoun, a Mamlouk who had risen high in a former sovereign's service,
seized power. He directed his energies towards capturing the last
places that remained in the hands of the Crusaders.
Kalaoun was followed
by his son, Khalil (Malek al-Ashraf Salah ed-Din) who carried out
his father's policy to drive the Franks out of Syria. On 17th June
1291 he captured and destroyed Acre after a siege of forty-three
days. This was followed by the capture of Tyre, Sidon and Beirut.
Dimashki, born in 1256 in Damascus, wrote a description of his native
land. He gives us many details of the state of the country after
the departure of the Crusaders. He writes:
"Saladin did not gain possession of Tyre,
for in his days it remained in the hands of the Christians, and
was only retaken by Salah ed-Din Khalil, and it was he who laid
it in ruins. In the space of forty-seven days retook from the Christians
the fortresses of Athlith, Haifa, Iskandarounah, Tyre, Sidon, Beirut,
Jbeil, Anfah, Batroun and Sarafand."
The Arab historian
and future ruler of Hama, Abul-Fida, states:
"After the conquest of Acre, God struck
fear into the hearts of those Franj still remaining on the coast.
Thus did they precipitately evacuate Sidon, Beirut, Tyre, and all
the other towns. The sultan therefore had the good fortune, shared
by none other, of easily conquering all those strongholds, which
he immediately had dismantled. With these conquests all the lands
of the coast were fully returned to the Muslims, a result undreamed
of. Thus were the Franj, who had once nearly conquered Damascus,
Egypt, and many other lands, expelled from all of Syria and the
coastal zones. God grant that they never set foot there again."
The Holy Land was thus cleared of the Crusaders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|